Saturday, April 29, 2017
Saturday, March 25, 2017
World Renowned Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What Really Causes Heart Disease By: Dr. Dwight Lundell
World Renowned Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What
Really Causes Heart Disease
By: Dr. Dwight
Lundell
We physicians with
all our training, knowledge and authority often acquire a rather large ego that
tends to make it difficult to admit we are wrong. So, here it is. I freely
admit to being wrong.. As a heart surgeon with 25 years experience, having
performed over 5,000 open-heart surgeries,today is my day to right the wrong
with medical and scientific fact.
I trained for many
years with other prominent physicians labelled “opinion makers.”
Bombarded with scientific literature, continually attending education
seminars, we opinion makers insisted heart disease resulted from the simple
fact of elevated blood cholesterol.
The only accepted
therapy was prescribing medications to lower cholesterol and a diet that
severely restricted fat intake. The latter of course we insisted would lower
cholesterol and heart disease. Deviations from these recommendations were
considered heresy and could quite possibly result in malpractice.
It Is Not Working!
These recommendations
are no longer scientifically or morally defensible. The discovery a few years
ago that inflammation in the artery wall is the real cause of heart disease is slowly leading to a
paradigm shift in how heart disease and other chronic ailments will be treated.
The long-established
dietary recommendations have created epidemics of obesity and diabetes, the consequences of which dwarf any historical plague in terms
of mortality, human suffering and dire economic consequences.
Despite the fact that
25% of the population takes expensive statin medications and despite the fact
we have reduced the fat content of our diets, more Americans will die this year
of heart disease than ever before.
Statistics from the
American Heart Association show that 75 million Americans currently suffer from
heart disease, 20 million have diabetes and 57 million have pre-diabetes. These
disorders are affecting younger and younger people in greater numbers every
year.
Simply stated, without inflammation being present in the body,
there is no way that cholesterol would accumulate in the wall of the blood
vessel and cause heart disease and strokes. Without inflammation, cholesterol would move freely throughout
the body as nature intended. It is inflammation that causes cholesterol to
become trapped.
Inflammation is not
complicated — it is quite simply your body’s natural defence to a foreign
invader such as a bacteria, toxin or virus. The cycle of inflammation is
perfect in how it protects your body from these bacterial and viral invaders.
However, if we chronically expose the body to injury by toxins or foods
the human body was never designed to process, a condition occurs called chronic
inflammation. Chronic inflammation is just as harmful as acute
inflammation is beneficial.
What thoughtful
person would willfully expose himself repeatedly to foods or other substances
that are known to cause injury to the body? Well, smokers perhaps, but at
least they made that choice willfully.
The rest of us have simply followed the recommended mainstream
diet that is low in fat and high in polyunsaturated fats and carbohydrates, not
knowing we were causing repeated injury to our blood vessels. This repeated injury creates chronic
inflammation leading to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.
Let me repeat
that: The injury and inflammation in our blood vessels is caused by the
low fat diet recommended for years by mainstream medicine.
What are the biggest culprits of chronic inflammation? Quite simply, they are the overload of
simple, highly processed carbohydrates (sugar, flour and all the products made
from them) and the excess consumption of omega-6 vegetable oils like
soybean, corn and sunflower that are found in many processed foods.
Take a moment to
visualize rubbing a stiff brush repeatedly over soft skin until it becomes
quite red and nearly bleeding. you kept this up several times a day, every day
for five years. If you could tolerate this painful brushing, you would have a
bleeding, swollen infected area that became worse with each repeated injury.
This is a good way to visualize the inflammatory process that could be going on
in your body right now.
Regardless of where
the inflammatory process occurs, externally or internally, it is the same. I
have peered inside thousands upon thousands of arteries. A diseased artery
looks as if someone took a brush and scrubbed repeatedly against its wall.
Several times a day, every day, the foods we eat create small injuries compounding
into more injuries, causing the body to respond continuously and appropriately
with inflammation.
While we savor the
tantalizing taste of a sweet roll, our bodies respond alarmingly as if a
foreign invader arrived declaring war. Foods loaded with sugars and
simple carbohydrates, or processed withomega-6 oils for long shelf
life have been the mainstay of the American diet for six decades. These
foods have been slowly poisoning everyone.
How does eating a simple sweet roll create a cascade of inflammation
to make you sick?
Imagine spilling
syrup on your keyboard and you have a visual of what occurs inside the cell.
When we consume simple carbohydrates such as sugar, blood sugar rises rapidly.
In response, your pancreas secretes insulin whose primary purpose is to drive
sugar into each cell where it is stored for energy. If the cell is full and
does not need glucose, it is rejected to avoid extra sugar gumming up the
works.
When your full cells
reject the extra glucose, blood sugar rises producing more insulin and the
glucose converts to stored fat.
What does all this
have to do with inflammation? Blood sugar is controlled in a very narrow range.
Extra sugar molecules attach to a variety of proteins that in turn injure the
blood vessel wall. This repeated injury to the blood vessel wall sets off
inflammation. When you spike your
blood sugar level several times a day, every day, it is exactly like taking
sandpaper to the inside of your delicate blood vessels.
While you may not be
able to see it, rest assured it is there. I saw it in over 5,000 surgical
patients spanning 25 years who all shared one common denominator — inflammation
in their arteries.
Let’s get back to the
sweet roll. That innocent looking goody not only contains sugars, it is baked in
one of many omega-6 oils such as soybean. Chips and fries are soaked in soybean
oil; processed foods are manufactured with omega-6 oils for longer shelf life.
While omega-6’s are essential -they are part of every cell membrane controlling
what goes in and out of the cell – they must be in the correct balance
with omega-3’s.
If the balance shifts
by consuming excessive omega-6, the cell
membrane produces chemicals called cytokines that
directly cause inflammation.
Today’s mainstream
American diet has produced an extreme imbalance of these two fats. The ratio of
imbalance ranges from 15:1 to as high as 30:1 in favor of omega-6. That’s a
tremendous amount of cytokines causing inflammation. In today’s food
environment, a 3:1 ratio would be optimal and healthy.
To make matters
worse, the excess weight you are carrying from eating these foods creates
overloaded fat cells that pour out large quantities of pro-inflammatory
chemicals that add to the injury caused by having high blood sugar. The process that began with a sweet roll
turns into a vicious cycle over time that creates heart disease, high
blood pressure, diabetes and finally, Alzheimer’s disease, as the
inflammatory process continues unabated.
There is no escaping the fact that the more we consume prepared
and processed foods, the more we trip the inflammation switch little by little
each day. The human body cannot process, nor was it designed to consume, foods
packed with sugars and soaked in omega-6 oils.
There is but one answer to quieting inflammation, and that is
returning to foods closer to their natural state. To build muscle, eat more
protein. Choose carbohydrates that are very complex such as colorful
fruits and vegetables. Cut down on
or eliminate inflammation- causing omega-6 fats like corn and soybean oil and
the processed foods that are made from them.
One tablespoon of
corn oil contains 7,280 mg of omega-6; soybean contains 6,940 mg. Instead,
use olive oil or butter from grass-fed beef.
Animal
fats contain less than 20% omega-6 and are much less likely to cause
inflammation than the supposedly healthy oils labelled polyunsaturated. Forget
the “science” that has been drummed into your head for decades. The science that saturated fat alone causes
heart disease is non-existent. The science that saturated fat raises blood
cholesterol is also very weak. Since we
now know that cholesterol is not the cause of heart disease, the concern
about saturated fat is even more absurd today.
The cholesterol theory led to the no-fat, low-fat
recommendations that in turn created the very foods now causing an epidemic of
inflammation. Mainstream medicine made a terrible mistake when it advised
people to avoid saturated fat in favor of foods high in omega-6 fats. We now have an epidemic of arterial
inflammation leading to heart disease and other silent killers.
What you can do is
choose whole foods your grandmother served and not those your mom
turned to as grocery store aisles filled with manufactured foods. By
eliminating inflammatory foods and adding essential nutrients from fresh
unprocessed food, you will reverse years of damage in your arteries and
throughout your body from consuming the typical American diet.
Monday, February 27, 2017
Friday, June 24, 2016
St Josemarie's 17 Signs of a Lack of Humility
Below is an excerpt from the writings of St. Josemaria which can help us identify a lack of humility in ourselves.
Allow me to remind you that among other evident signs of a lack of humility are:
- Thinking that what you do or say is better than what others do or say
- Always wanting to get your own way
- Arguing when you are not right or — when you are — insisting stubbornly or with bad manners
- Giving your opinion without being asked for it, when charity does not demand you to do so
- Despising the point of view of others
- Not being aware that all the gifts and qualities you have are on loan
- Not acknowledging that you are unworthy of all honour or esteem, even the ground you are treading on or the things you own
- Mentioning yourself as an example in conversation
- Speaking badly about yourself, so that they may form a good opinion of you, or contradict you
- Making excuses when rebuked
- Hiding some humiliating faults from your director, so that he may not lose the good opinion he has of you
- Hearing praise with satisfaction, or being glad that others have spoken well of you
- Being hurt that others are held in greater esteem than you
- Refusing to carry out menial tasks
- Seeking or wanting to be singled out
- Letting drop words of self-praise in conversation, or words that might show your honesty, your wit or skill, your professional prestige…
- Being ashamed of not having certain possessions…
St. Josemaria, pray for us!
Saturday, September 5, 2015
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
The Kerygma by Kiko Arguello
"The Way's founder, Kiko Arguello, has written a book that is dramatic, intense, and deeply personal"
Source: Catholic Herald
I have just finished reading The Kerygma, by Kiko Arguello, published by Ignatius and distributed in the UK by Gracewing. For those who haven’t heard of this author, he is the founder, along with Carmel Hernandez, of the Neocatechumenal Way, one of the largest of the new movements in the Church. I am very glad I have read Kiko’s book as it has cleared up some misconceptions I had about the Way, as it is often referred to: that it operates within the Church like a cult and is divisive within the parish setting. Rather, what the Way offers is a wholehearted commitment to the Gospels. Indeed, the word “Kerygma”, chosen as the title of the book, means to announce the Good News of Christ – in a manner that keeps it permanently alive in the lives and hearts of its members.
Kiko Arguello was a young, successful Spanish artist in Spain in the early 1960s who had lapsed from his childhood faith but who was desperate to find a spiritual meaning to life. He writes, “I couldn’t be indifferent as to whether God exists or not, it was a matter of life and death.” He briefly flirted with Marxism; disillusioned by its lack of a spiritual vision he did what traditionally the saints have often done: he decided to live in a notorious shantytown, a “descent into hell”, where he daily experienced the seemingly intractable problems of the poor: violence, alcoholism, disease and despair. He took with him his guitar and a Bible and slept on a mattress on the dirt floor of a shack. The question that consumed him was: how did the early apostles spread the Gospels? How could he preach effectively to people living in such degradation?
A meeting with Carmen, a lay missionary who was also drawn to living among the poor led to the founding of the Way. They based it on three things: the word of God, the Eucharist and the Christian community. They both felt that the usual parish structure that had developed over centuries was not adequate as a “school for Christians” – especially the outcasts, gypsies, tramps and slum dwellers who did not fit into normal society.
They realised you cannot evangelise others without personal conversion. This required proper formation in the faith as well as ongoing catechesis, regular prayer, study and Bible reading. The idea of the “Christian community” was born. Its purpose: the evangelisation of those far from the Church, modern secular men and women whom the parish structure could not reach. Members of the Way recognise the need to form Christian communities of love, for it is only through love that others will be drawn to the listen to the “Kerygma” and be transformed by it.
Kiko’s book is not a detailed, chronological history of this new movement; he doesn’t include a description of its development around the world or its numbers, though he does mention casually that 300,000 young members attended the World Youth Day in Madrid and that the Way is – amazingly – preparing to send thousands of priests to China. His writing is dramatic, intense, deeply personal and poured out from the heart; the story of how one man allowed the Holy Spirit to work within him and thus do extraordinary things. I do recommend it.
One of the key aspects of the Way is members’ sense of mission. Being a Christian, they believe, is never a matter of private, weekly devotion; it is always outgoing, evangelical and bound up with renewal and conversion. Only at the end of the book did I get a glimpse of the problems such a vivid and total form of Christian discipleship might pose in your average parish. Kiko comments, that “We have been persecuted and expelled from many parishes. Sometimes the Way is misunderstood and confused with a sect”. He doesn’t explain this further.
Having read the book I was curious to find out from an actual member of the Neocatchumenal Way how it impacts on one’s life. Elizabeth Flynn is a longstanding member of a London community. She tells me that as a young adult Catholic she spent some years among Evangelicals, drawn to their warmth and fellowship. She was attracted to their uninhibited way of talking about a personal relationship with Jesus and their enthusiasm for conversion. But she knew they lacked authority and eventually she joined Crux, a small Catholic study-group. But it still “wasn’t quite what I was looking for”. Finally she went along to a community of the Way that was meeting in the parish of St Charles Borromeo. “From the very first evening I knew I was in the right place” she tells me. That was in 1993.
At every session she attended she heard something new “that drew me further on.” She emphasises that they are clear about Church authority and completely obedient to the Church’s magisterial teaching. “The way they preach makes the Bible come alive” she feels, and that she has come to a much closer knowledge and love of God through the Scriptures, as a result of membership.
Elizabeth believes that joining the Neocatechumenal Way has changed her life in every way. “Life is full and rich and even suffering makes sense” she says. She also has “a much deeper relationship with God than I could ever have imagined possible.” She adds that she is much more confident about “putting my head above the parapet and letting people know I’m a Christian.” She thinks the kind of Christian formation and support she receives simply isn’t available in the wider parish. She tells me the Way is also largely successful in keeping teenagers and young people within the Faith. It encourages large families because “the teaching is uncompromisingly open to life.” There are many vocations and thus a hugely expanding number of seminaries worldwide.
I ask her the question about what seems to be the source of much discontent: why do they celebrate their own liturgy? Elizabeth says that they participate in the parish liturgy but also have their own mid-week liturgy, so that members of the community who have undergone catechesis together can deepen their bonds with each other in their continuing journey of faith. It gives them “the opportunity to share, after the Bible readings, what God is saying to them through his Word. This needs to be done within the enclosed group so that privacy can be maintained.”
She is clear that they do not want to be a special group within the parish and that they try to blend in. She sums it up: “We’re Catholics living the faith, radically, in the parish.” It strikes me that this might be enough to make other parishioners, who are less zealous or committed, feel challenged and disturbed. But I also have the uncomfortable feeling that this is actually what God demands of all of us. After all, wasn’t Jesus radical? And aren’t his teachings still radical and uncompromising today – for those who have ears to hear?
She is clear that they do not want to be a special group within the parish and that they try to blend in. She sums it up: “We’re Catholics living the faith, radically, in the parish.” It strikes me that this might be enough to make other parishioners, who are less zealous or committed, feel challenged and disturbed. But I also have the uncomfortable feeling that this is actually what God demands of all of us. After all, wasn’t Jesus radical? And aren’t his teachings still radical and uncompromising today – for those who have ears to hear?
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)